Researchers and scientists argue that our understanding of sex is still primitive and outdated. They suggest that “sex” should not be the primary variable in research, but rather measurable factors like the presence of a uterus, hormone levels, and genetics. Using sex as a proxy for specific variables can lead to inaccuracies in research, such as underestimating risks for conditions like uterine cancer. The push for more precision in research is seen as crucial in addressing gender disparities in health. Moving beyond using sex as a simplistic category requires a more nuanced approach that considers the complexity and variability within genders.
Source link
Male and female sex labels in research insufficient, scientists say
