Comparing decentralized machine learning and AI clinical models to local and centralized alternatives: a systematic review

Summarize this content to 100 words: Omran, A. R. The epidemiologic transition: a theory of the epidemiology of population change. Milb ank. Meml. Fund. Q. 49, 509–538, https://doi.org/10.2307/3349375 (1971).
Google Scholar 
The World Bank. World Bank Open Data – Current health expenditure (% of GDP). World Bank Open Data. Accessed 29 January 2024. https://data.worldbank.orgWorld Health Organization. Global spending on health: Weathering the storm. December 10, 2020. accessed 29 January 2024. https://www.who.int/publications-detail-redirect/9789240017788OECD. Fiscal Sustainability of Health Systems: How to Finance More Resilient Health Systems When Money Is Tight? Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development; Accessed January 29, 2024. https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/social-issues-migration-health/fiscal-sustainability-of-health-systems_880f3195-en 2024.Licchetta M. & Stelmach M. Fiscal Sustainability Analytical Paper: Fiscal Sustainability and Public Spending on Health. Office for Budget Responsibility (United Kingdom) Accessed 13 September 2023. https://obr.uk/docs/dlm_uploads/Health-FSAP.pdfWorld Health Organization. World Health Statistics 2024: Monitoring Health for the SDGs, Sustainable Development Goals. World Health Organization; 2024:96. Accessed 4 April 2025. https://iris.who.int/bitstream/handle/10665/376869/9789240094703-eng.pdf?sequence=1World Health Organization, World Bank. Tracking Universal Health Coverage 2023 Global Monitoring Report. 2023:160. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240080379Galea, G. et al. Quick buys for prevention and control of noncommunicable diseases. Lancet Reg. Health Eur. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lanepe.2025.101281 (2025).
Google Scholar 
Villalobos P, et al. Position: will we run out of data? Limits of LLM scaling based on human-generated data. In Proceedings of the 41stInternational Conference on Machine Learning. Accessed January 8, https://openreview.net/forum?id=ViZcgDQjyG (2024)Udandarao V, et al. No “Zero-Shot” Without Exponential Data: Pretraining Concept Frequency Determines Multimodal Model Performance. Adv Neural Inf Process Syst. 38. Accessed January 8, https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper_files/paper/2024/file/715b78ccfb6f4cada5528ac9b5278def-Paper-Conference.pdf (2024)Liu, F. & Panagiotakos, D. Real-world data: a brief review of the methods, applications, challenges and opportunities. BMC Med. Res. Methodol. 22, 287 (2022).
Google Scholar 
McMahan B, et al. Communication-efficient learning of deep networks from decentralized data. In Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics. 1273-1282. Accessed January 8, https://proceedings.mlr.press/v54/mcmahan17a.html (2017)Tajabadi, M. & Heider, D. Fair swarm learning: improving incentives for collaboration by a fair reward mechanism. Knowl.Based Syst. 304, 112451 (2024).
Google Scholar 
Linardos, A., Kushibar, K., Walsh, S., Gkontra, P. & Lekadir, K. Federated learning for multi-center imaging diagnostics: a simulation study in cardiovascular disease. Sci. Rep. 12, 3551 (2022).
Google Scholar 
Lee, H. et al. Federated learning for thyroid ultrasound image analysis to protect personal information: validation study in a real health care environment. JMIR Med. Inform. 9, e25869 (2021).
Google Scholar 
Lo, J. et al. Federated learning for microvasculature segmentation and diabetic retinopathy classification of OCT Data. Ophthalmol. Sci. 1, 100069 (2021).
Google Scholar 
Soltan, A. A. S. et al. A scalable federated learning solution for secondary care using low-cost microcomputing: privacy-preserving development and evaluation of a COVID-19 screening test in UK hospitals. Lancet Digit Health 6, e93–e104 (2024).
Google Scholar 
Haggenmüller, S. et al. Federated learning for decentralized artificial intelligence in melanoma diagnostics. JAMA Dermatol. 160, 303–311 (2024).
Google Scholar 
Kundu, D. et al. Federated deep learning for monkeypox disease detection on GAN-augmented dataset. IEEE Access. 12, 32819–32829 (2024).
Google Scholar 
Nguyen, T. P. V. et al. Lightweight federated learning for STIs/HIV prediction. Sci. Rep. 14, 6560 (2024).
Google Scholar 
Warnat-Herresthal, S. et al. Swarm Learning for decentralized and confidential clinical machine learning. Nature 594, 265–270 (2021).
Google Scholar 
Saldanha, O. L. et al. Swarm learning for decentralized artificial intelligence in cancer histopathology. Nat. Med. 28, 1232–1239 (2022).
Google Scholar 
Breiman, L. Bagging predictors. Mach. Learn. 24, 123–140 (1996).
Google Scholar 
European Parliament. Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 June 2024 Laying down Harmonised Rules on Artificial Intelligence and Amending Regulations (EC) No 300/2008, (EU) No 167/2013, (EU) No 168/2013, (EU) 2018/858, (EU) 2018/1139 and (EU) 2019/2144 and Directives 2014/90/EU, (EU) 2016/797 and (EU) 2020/1828 (Artificial Intelligence Act) (Text with EEA Relevance).; 2024. Accessed 3 November 2024. http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2024/1689/oj/engBrauneck, A. et al. Federated machine learning, privacy-enhancing technologies, and data protection laws in medical research: scoping review. J. Med. Internet Res. 25, e41588 (2023).
Google Scholar 
Woisetschläger, H. et al. Federated Learning Priorities Under the European Union Artificial Intelligence Act. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2402.05968 (2024).Zerka, F. et al. Systematic review of privacy-preserving distributed machine learning from federated databases in health care. JCO Clin. Cancer Inform. 4, 184–200 (2020).
Google Scholar 
Agbo, C. C., Mahmoud, Q. H. & Eklund, J. M. Blockchain technology in healthcare: a systematic review. Healthcare 7, 56 (2019).
Google Scholar 
Crowson, M. G. et al. A systematic review of federated learning applications for biomedical data. PLOS Digital Health 1, e0000033 (2022).
Google Scholar 
Qammar, A., Karim, A., Ning, H. & Ding, J. Securing federated learning with blockchain: a systematic literature review. Artif. Intell. Rev. Published online September 16, 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-022-10271-9 (2022).Antunes, R. S., André da Costa, C., Küderle, A., Yari, I. A. & Eskofier, B. Federated learning for healthcare: systematic review and architecture proposal. ACM Trans. Intell. Syst. Technol. 13, 54:1–54:23 (2022).
Google Scholar 
Diniz, J. M. et al. Comparing decentralized learning methods for health data models to nondecentralized alternatives: protocol for a systematic review. JMIR Res. Protoc. 12, e45823 (2023).
Google Scholar 
Souza, R. et al. A multi-center distributed learning approach for Parkinson’s disease classification using the traveling model paradigm. Front. Artif. Intell. 7, 1301997 (2024).
Google Scholar 
Qu, L., Balachandar, N., Zhang, M. & Rubin, D. Handling data heterogeneity with generative replay in collaborative learning for medical imaging. Med. Image Anal. 78, 102424 (2022).
Google Scholar 
Khalil, S. S., Tawfik, N. S. & Spruit, M. Exploring the potential of federated learning in mental health research: a systematic literature review. Appl. Intell. 54, 1619–1636 (2024).
Google Scholar 
Teo, Z. L. et al. Federated machine learning in healthcare: A systematic review on clinical applications and technical architecture. CR Med. 5, 101419 (2024).
Google Scholar 
Hiwale, M., Walambe, R., Potdar, V. & Kotecha, K. A systematic review of privacy-preserving methods deployed with blockchain and federated learning for the telemedicine. Healthc. Anal. 3, 100192 (2023).
Google Scholar 
Sohan, M. F. & Basalamah, A. A systematic review on federated learning in medical image analysis. IEEE Access. 11, 28628–28644 (2023).
Google Scholar 
Wagner, I. & Eckhoff, D. Technical privacy metrics: a systematic survey. ACM Comput. Surv. 51, 57:1–57:38 (2018).
Google Scholar 
Kaabachi, B. et al. A scoping review of privacy and utility metrics in medical synthetic data. npj Digit Med. 8, 60 (2025).
Google Scholar 
Xu, J., Wu, Z., Wang, C. & Jia, X. Machine unlearning: solutions and challenges. IEEE Trans. Emerg. Top. Comput. Intell. 8, 2150–2168 (2024).
Google Scholar 
Bercea, C. I., Wiestler, B., Rueckert, D. & Schnabel, J. A. Evaluating normative representation learning in generative AI for robust anomaly detection in brain imaging. Nat. Commun. 16, 1624 (2025).
Google Scholar 
Ouzzani, M., Hammady, H., Fedorowicz, Z. & Elmagarmid, A. Rayyan—a web and mobile app for systematic reviews. Syst. Rev. 5, 210 (2016).
Google Scholar 
Page, M. J. et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 372, n71 (2021).
Google Scholar 
Moons, K. G. M. et al. PROBAST+AI: an updated quality, risk of bias, and applicability assessment tool for prediction models using regression or artificial intelligence methods. BMJ 388, e082505 (2025).
Google Scholar 
Collins, G. S., Reitsma, J. B., Altman, D. G. & Moons, K. G. M. Transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis (TRIPOD): the TRIPOD statement. Ann. Intern. Med. 162, 55–63 (2015).
Google Scholar 

Source link