Scott, S. H. & Kalaska, J. F. Voluntary movement: Motor cortices. In Principles of Neural Science (eds Kandel, E. R. et al.) 815–859 (McGraw Hill, 2021).
Nielsen, J. B. & Jessell, T. M. Sensory-motor integration in the spinal cord. In Principles of Neural Science (eds Kandel, E. R. et al.) 761–782 (McGraw Hill, 2021).
Bastian, A. J. & Lisberger, S. G. The cerebellum. In Principles of Neural Science (eds Kandel, E. R. et al.) 908–931 (McGraw Hill, 2021).
Vidal, P.-P. & Lacquaniti, F. Perceptual-motor styles. Exp. Brain Res. 239, 1359–1380 (2021).
Słowiński, P. et al. Dynamic similarity promotes interpersonal coordination in joint action. J. R. Soc. Interface 13, 20151093 (2016).
Aeles, J., Horst, F., Lapuschkin, S., Lacourpaille, L. & Hug, F. Revealing the unique features of each individual’s muscle activation signatures. J. R. Soc. Interface 18, 20200770 (2021).
Loula, F., Prasad, S., Harber, K. & Shiffrar, M. Recognizing people from their movement. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 31, 210–220 (2005).
Coste, A. et al. Decoding identity from motion: How motor similarities colour our perception of self and others. Psychol. Res. 85, 509–519 (2021).
Troje, N. F., Westhoff, C. & Lavrov, M. Person identification from biological motion: Effects of structural and kinematic cues. Percept. Psychophys. 67, 667–675 (2005).
Pataky, T. C., Mu, T., Bosch, K., Rosenbaum, D. & Goulermas, J. Y. Gait recognition: Highly unique dynamic plantar pressure patterns among 104 individuals. J. R. Soc. Interface 9, 790–800 (2012).
Krus, P. H., Bruininks, R. H. & Robertson, G. Structure of motor abilities in children. Percept. Mot. Skills 52, 119–129 (1981).
Hands, B. & Larkin, D. Using the Rasch measurement model to investigate the construct of motor ability in young children. J. Appl. Meas. 2, 101–120 (2001).
Ibrahim, H., Hear, N. P. & Blanksby, B. Exploring the general motor ability construct. Percept. Mot. Skills 113, 491–508 (2011).
Henry, F. M. Reaction time-movement time correlations. Percept. Mot. Skills 12, 63–66 (1961).
Haga, M., Pedersen, A. V. & Sigmundsson, H. Interrelationship among selected measures of motor skills. Child 34, 245–248 (2008).
Nance, R. D. The effects of pacing and distribution on intercorrelations of motor abilities. J. Exp. Psychol. 37, 459–472. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0060705 (1947).
Lorås, H. & Sigmundsson, H. Interrelations between three fine motor skills in young adults. Percept. Mot. Skills 115, 171–178 (2012).
Scott, S. H. Apparatus for measuring and perturbing shoulder and elbow joint positions and torques during reaching. J. Neurosci. Methods 89, 119–127 (1999).
Singh, K. & Scott, S. H. A motor learning strategy reflects neural circuitry for limb control. Nat. Neurosci. 6, 399–403 (2003).
Coderre, A. M. et al. Assessment of upper-limb sensorimotor function of subacute stroke patients using visually guided reaching. Neurorehabilit. Neural Repair 24, 528–541 (2010).
Otaka, E. et al. Clinical usefulness and validity of robotic measures of reaching movement in hemiparetic stroke patients. J. NeuroEng. Rehabilit. 12, 66 (2015).
Kenzie, J. M. et al. Anatomical correlates of proprioceptive impairments following acute stroke: A case series. J. Neurol. Sci. 342, 52–61 (2014).
Simmatis, L., Krett, J., Scott, S. H. & Jin, A. Y. Robotic exoskeleton assessment of transient ischemic attack. PLoS ONE 12, 1–13 (2017).
Tyryshkin, K. et al. A robotic object hitting task to quantify sensorimotor impairments in participants with stroke. J. NeuroEng. Rehabilit. 11, 47 (2014).
Wiratman, W., Kobayashi, S., Chang, F.-Y., Asano, K. & Ugawa, Y. Assessment of cognitive and motor skills in Parkinson’s disease by a robotic object hitting game. Front. Neurol. 10, 19 (2019).
Bourke, T. C. et al. A robot-based behavioural task to quantify impairments in rapid motor decisions and actions after stroke. J. Neuroeng. Rehabilit. 13, 91 (2016).
Lowrey, C., Jackson, C., Bagg, S., Dukelow, S. & Scott, S. A novel robotic task for assessing impairments in bimanual coordination post-stroke. Int. J. Phys. Med. Rehabilit. S3, 002 (2014).
Wood, M. D., Simmatis, L. E. R., Gordon Boyd, J., Scott, S. H. & Jacobson, J. A. Using principal component analysis to reduce complex datasets produced by robotic technology in healthy participants. J. NeuroEng. Rehabilit. 15, 71 (2018).
Wickens, C. D. The effects of divided attention on information processing in manual tracking. J. Exp. Psychol. 2, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-15126.96.36.199 (1976).
Rinne, P. et al. Motor dexterity and strength depend upon integrity of the attention-control system. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 115, E536 LP-E545 (2018).
Benjamini, Y. & Hochberg, Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B 57, 289–300 (1995).
Cross, C. L. Statistical and methodological considerations when using cluster analysis in neuropsychological research BT. In Cluster Analysis in Neuropsychological Research (eds Allen, D. N. & Goldstein, G.) 13–35 (Springer New York, 2013).
Cicchetti, D. V. Guidelines, criteria and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology. Psychol. Assess. 6, 284–290 (1994).
Weir, J. P. Quantifying test-retest reliability using the intraclass correlation coefficient and the SEM. J. Strength Cond. Res. 19, 231–240 (2005).
Simmatis, L. E. R., Early, S., Moore, K. D., Appaqaq, S. & Scott, S. H. Statistical measures of motor, sensory and cognitive performance across repeated robot-based testing. J. NeuroEng. Rehabilit. 17, 86 (2020).
Lowrey, C. R., Bourke, T. C., Bagg, S. D., Dukelow, S. P. & Scott, S. H. A postural unloading task to assess fast corrective responses in the upper limb following stroke. J. NeuroEng. Rehabilit. 16, 16 (2019).
Maselli, A. et al. A whole body characterization of individual strategies, gender differences and common styles in overarm throwing. J. Neurophysiol. 122, 2486–2503 (2019).
Chang, M. et al. Whole-body kinematics and coordination in a complex dance sequence: Differences across skill levels. Hum. Mov. Sci. 69, 102564 (2020).
Gløersen, Ø., Myklebust, H., Hallén, J. & Federolf, P. Technique analysis in elite athletes using principal component analysis. J. Sports Sci. 36, 229–237 (2018).
Schorer, J., Baker, J., Fath, F. & Jaitner, T. Identification of interindividual and intraindividual movement patterns in handball players of varying expertise levels. J. Mot. Behav. 39, 409–421 (2007).
Tresilian, J. R. & Stelmach, G. E. Common organization for unimanual and bimanual reach-to-grasp tasks. Exp. Brain Res. 115, 283–299 (1997).
Yan, Y., Goodman, J. M., Moore, D. D., Solla, S. A. & Bensmaia, S. J. Unexpected complexity of everyday manual behaviors. Nat. Commun. 11, 1–8 (2020).
Zacharias, S. & Kirk, A. Drawing with the non-dominant hand: Implications for the study of construction. Can. J. Neurol. Sci. J. Can. Sci. Neurol. 25(4), 306–309 (1998).
Philip, B. A. & Frey, S. H. Increased functional connectivity between cortical hand areas and praxis network associated with training-related improvements in non-dominant hand precision drawing. Neuropsychologia 87, 157–168 (2016).
Hore, J., Watts, S., Tweed, D. & Miller, B. Overarm throws with the nondominant arm: Kinematics of accuracy. J. Neurophysiol. 76, 3693–3704 (1996).
de Kovel, C. G. F., Carrión-Castillo, A. & Francks, C. A large-scale population study of early life factors influencing left-handedness. Sci. Rep. 9, 584 (2019).
Peters, M., Reimers, S. & Manning, J. T. Hand preference for writing and associations with selected demographic and behavioral variables in 255,100 subjects: The BBC internet study. Brain Cogn. 62, 177–189 (2006).
Wood, M. D. et al. Principal components analysis using data collected from healthy individuals on two robotic assessment platforms yields similar behavioral patterns. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 15, 652201 (2021).
Wanzel, K. R. et al. Visual-spatial ability correlates with efficiency of hand motion and successful surgical performance. Surgery 134, 750–757 (2003).
Cutting, J. E. & Kozlowski, L. T. Recognizing friends by their walk: Gait perception without familiarity cues. Bull. Psychon. Soc. 9, 353–356 (1977).
Hug, F. et al. Individuals have unique muscle activation signatures as revealed during gait and pedaling. J. Appl. Physiol. 127, 1165–1174 (2019).
Hill, H. & Pollick, F. E. Exaggerating temporal differences enhances recognition of individuals from point light displays. Psychol. Sci. 11, 223–228 (2000).
Raibert M. Motor control and learning by the state space model. PhD Dissertation (1977).
Contreras-Vidal, J. L. & Buch, E. R. Effects of Parkinson’s disease on visuomotor adaptation. Exp. Brain Res. 150, 25–32 (2003).
Caimmi, M. et al. Using kinematic analysis to evaluate constraint-induced movement therapy in chronic stroke patients. Neurorehabilit. Neural Repair 22, 31–39 (2007).
Buchanan, J., Park, J.-H. & Shea, C. Target width scaling in a repetitive aiming task: Switching between cyclical and discrete units of action. Exp. Brain Res. Exp. Hirnforschung. Exp. Cérébrale 175, 710–725 (2006).
Hogan, N. & Sternad, D. On rhythmic and discrete movements: Reflections, definitions and implications for motor control. Exp. Brain Res. 181, 13–30 (2007).
Guiard, Y. On Fitts’s and Hooke’s laws: Simple harmonic movement in upper-limb cyclical aiming. Acta Psychol. 82, 139–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-6918(93)90009-G (1993).