of hand-held surgical instrument fit – A cross-sectional survey” by Weinriech et al.
We would like to commend the authors on their study of a very important topic, that
of the mismatch between human hand size (using glove size as a proxy) and hand-held
surgical instrument fit. However, the results of this study need to be interpreted
in the context of the following points.
To read this article in full you will need to make a payment
Purchase one-time access:
One-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select ‘Academic and Personal’
- For corporate R&D use, select ‘Corporate R&D Professionals’
Gender-differences of proceduralists in perception of hand-held surgical instrument fit–A cross-sectional survey.
Am J Surg. 2022; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2022.05.011
The adult human hand: some anthropometric and biomechanical considerations.
Hum Factors. 1971; 13: 117-131
Anthropometric Source Book: Anthropometry for designers. 1–3. National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Scientific and Technical Information Office,
1978 (NASA Source book-RP-1024)
Maximal power grasp and three-jaw chuck pinch force as a function of wrist position, age, and glove type.
Int J Ind Ergon. 1993; 11: 195-206
Gender equity in ergonomics: does muscle effort in laparoscopic surgery differ between men and women?.
Surg Endosc. 2022; 36: 396-401
The ergonomics of women in surgery.
Surg Endosc. 2014; 28: 1051-1055
Society of Surgical Ergonomics.org.
Received in revised form:
In Press Journal Pre-Proof
© 2022 Published by Elsevier Inc.